Tatya said:
Anna - could you direct me to where you found out about algae using blue light more efficiently than higher plants? I've just been told something that would seem to contradict that - so I'm kind of interested!
Hi,
initially it was observation: I had blue lights on my tank when I first got it and the plants did badly, whilst the algae was doing great.
Now with yellowish "Sun-glow" lights, the reverse is true.
Then I asked a botonist. Admittedly, we didn't talk wavelengths or anything, but he pointed out that chlorophyll is green because that is the spectrum of light it
reflects (i.e. blue with a little yellow = green), which means it actually
absorbs the other end of the spectrum (red with a lot of yellow = orangy-yellow).
However, chlorophyll is not one chemical and is actually different in different kinds of plants. The chlorophyll in higher plants is fairly light-insensitive compared to the chlorophyll in algae, which can utilise a far wider range of light sources (the reason that algae is one of the commonest groups of plants in the world, found everywhere there is light).
Now, this is in line with my vague, oh so vague memories from University (I seem to remember diagrams with red and blue arrows bouncing off various plant cells). However, I am talking about the visible spectrum (not UV) and I'm talking extremely generally. I have no doubt an algae that grows in the arctic is a lot more tolerant of blue light than an algae that lives at the bottom of a rain-forest pond!
Are you going to share the contradictory info? I'd be interested to compare.