"a Retrospective Of Photos Of Fish I Have Owned..."

The June FOTM Contest Poll is open!
FishForums.net Fish of the Month
🏆 Click to vote! 🏆

BrownBullhead

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Location
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA
"A retrospective of photos of fish I have owned..."

Hello all... I was cleaning up my folders on PhotoBucket and I thought I would share a retrospective of photos of fish I have owned over the previous two years since I got back into the hobby. I went at it a bit overkill for about a year, as I was always buying, trading, watching some fish dying... repeat 2-3 times per year the above cycle. Some of the fish I've kept in that time include...

Hexanematichthys seemanni {Colombian Shark} / Synodontis nigriventris {Upside-down Catfish} / Pimelodus pictus {Spotted Pictus Cat} / Pterophyllum scalare {Scalare Angelfish} / Balantiocheilus melanopterus {Bala Shark} / Pangasius sutchi {Iridescent Shark} / Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum {Tiger Shovelnose} / Leporinus fasciatus {Striped Headstander} / Distichodus sexfasciatus {Six-striped Headstander} / Cyphotilapia Frontosa {Frontosa} / Protopterus annectens {African Lungfish} / Erpetoichthys calabaricus {Rope Fish} / Agamyxis pectinifrons {Spotted Raphael} / Botia macracanthus {Clown Loach} / Typhlonectes natans {Rubber Eel}

As well as stuff I currently keep that includes Tropheus Black "Kiriza", Tropheus Moorii "Nkonde", Syno. Multipunctatus, and Syno. Petricola... I am sure I forgot some of my former species above, but anyway, it gives you an idea what you will see in the pictures below. Enjoy!

Note: Click the "Thumbnail" (Image Preview, small version) to see the FULL-SIZE image.
 
Thats very intresting...... :nod:
I like the Pterophyllum Scalare, Distichodus, and the Frontosa
 
Wow, its a good thing I have high speed, thats alot of pictures!!
 
i would take those pics out and leave links..

It says their are over 100 pics... and i kno alot of the users on here will not be able to load this because of slower connection speed. :crazy:
 
Adistar: 120+ links are going to be relatively meaningless to someone... they're not going to click 120 links hoping they "get to see the good ones." A 56.6 dial-up user should find these thumbnails take 2-3 minutes to load for the entire post... better than them waiting 30 seconds for the fullsize to load only to find out image after image it is not what they are interested in. :) That's the purpose of thumbnails... allow the preview of the images without actually downloading them. :)
 

Most reactions

Back
Top