Completely agree with Josh and Tolak. A lot of newcomers come in to our beginners section here and get subjected to all of us yakking about 5ppm constantly and then quite easily fall in to the image of 5ppm being the ammonia level produced by a fully stocked tank. It isn't, really. It's a quite large concentration that's really equivalent to considerably above full stocking, even by liberal guidelines I think.
What's so interesting about the chosen 5ppm in RDD's fishless cycling article, I feel, is that it seems to have withstood the test of time quite well as a methodology. I feel it really gets the colony sizes up to a robust enough level that when a first stocking (regardless of whether the first stocking is a full stocking or whether its less) drops off to match the bioload, it is extremely unlikely to subsequently mini-spike or have other problems handling the maintenance of a safe environment for the new fish.
The problem is that complex environmental systems of living things are not very linear in their behaviors. Bacteria don't just smoothly ramp up and down, they do it in jerks and spikes and sudden changes. The fishless cycling methodology that has evolved since the usenet days of the 1980's, along with our own little tweeks and refinements in recent years right here on TFF, has slowly homed in on a way to conduct the process with more reliability and efficiency.
Achieving a biofilter during fishless cycling that can process 5ppm ammonia in to zero ppm ammonia and zero ppm nitrite 12 hours after the 5ppm is dosed for a whole or at least partical "qualification week" is a really tough quality requirement. It may overshoot or undershoot the real needs in a few cases. But I feel it is our best effort at producing an excellent freshwater environment that new fish can be dropped in to and have the best chances of not only surviving but also thriving.
~~waterdrop~~