Since you asked me for input… but keep in mind that I did not read the other 3 pages of replies!
Tell me how it can work. I know how and why it wouldn't work, I've had enough opinions on that, but I'd especially appreciate people who have done something similar, eg big tank with multiple betta and decorations, to provide suggestions on improving the odds that I can house three male splendens in a tank together.
Why it won't work is part of why it will work, you can't have one without the other.
I'm going to have a 4x2x2 ft (~100 gallons)
The height is irrelevant, as is the volume: the males would split the tank up based on territory area. For a 4*2 ft, I would recommend a maximum of two males. If you want to go for 3, a 5-6*1-2 ft footprint would be better. Still, keeping males together is a bad idea unless you have at least two quarantine tanks in case things go wrong (you need to have these before you buy the
Bettas). I found that for
Bettas, there is even little difference between a 4*2*2 ft tank compared to a 4*1*1 ft tank when keeping males together, the length is most important.
heavily planted tank (high tech for those of you) that would look something like this: http
/www.aquascapingworld.com/gallery/images/1/1_18.jpg though with more smaller plants where the rocks are and much less rocks.
The tank you linked to is not heavily planted, it is medium planted. Heavily planted would be so thick with plants that you and the fish can not see from one end to the other because of plants. There would be no open areas, the fish would *always* be swimming through plants.
This is heavily planted (note how plants come all the way to the front): http
/i14.photobucket.com/albums/a323/maxwell1295/Fish/Fishies336.jpg
This is moderately heavily planted (could do with some more in the middle and no algae): http
/img205.imageshack.us/img205/5624/p1040777.jpg
This is heavily planted on the left side: http
/i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/cmats12889/IMAG0058.jpg
…I think you get the general idea now. With a moderately planted tank, this is *very* unlikely to work.
Dual filters, inline heaters in both, with modifications on the intake and outtake pipes so the current is low enough for the bettas.
Be careful with this as flow impeding modifications can encourage the filter to break and can prevent it from functioning properly. Why would you not go for only one filter? There is little point in taking two filters and then reducing the flow… but if you go for the amount of plants you will need to make sure the fish never meet each other, even a severely underpowered filter would be enough.
I'm going to throw in a bunch of shrimps also; the tank will have only the shrimps and the three male betta splendens. I'll be choosing the boys from LFS so I can hopefully buy those that are less obviously aggressive--unless it doesn't matter so I can get them online? A halfmoon and a crowntail for sure and another one that I like the look of--they won't come from the same spawn.
You would be better off buying young (barely sexable) siblings as very young males are moderately peaceful and aggression is usually triggered by a change in the environment, as much as small spaces.
An aggressive male will happily shred another male in a tank that size, so it is definitely worth going for placid fish.
I'll be using quarantine bottles/jars for them (about 1+ gallon) and release them at the same time in different spots of the tank in the hope that they have an equal chance to choose their own territory; so that it isn't one will establish their territory first and dominate the others when they go into the tank much later.
The introduction order doesn't matter much, I found; just don't put a new male next to the old one.
The reason for three males is I've seen several shoaling fish that were fine in bigger groups, 3 or 4 at least, but when they were left with two, one would chase the other endlessly. I know they're not shoaling fish; it's hopefully to even out the aggression and the tank would be big enough in territory for the boys. Three males are also easier to manage than having bigger group.
The principle is sound for schooling species (which is why I think they should never be kept in groups of smaller than 6, and 10-15+ is a better minimum), but
Bettas are solitary fish with a territory requirement, so the principle does not apply. While spreading the aggression is a good idea, it is not good to increase the likelihood of the males meeting. If you want to make this work, your aim should be to make sure that the males *do not meet*.
There's also a consideration that they might simply hide in the plants and not come out a lot?
Yep, that's the idea: they should spend all their time in the plants.
My back up plan: if it fails, I'll return them to the bottles and buy a few 2ft, scape them and make the main tank for ramirezi.
Maximum 3 juvenile pairs and you'll have to add all 3 at the same time. They will do better in a shorter tank, for example a 4 ft long * 2 ft front to back * 1-1.5 ft tall, instead of 2 ft tall: they come from shallow areas and seem "lost" in taller tanks, in my experience.
To be honest, it does not sound like what you're asking for is what you actually want. I recommend that you pass on the
Bettas and go for the blue rams. A good alternative would be 10-30 female
Betta spendens or a large group of any of the peaceful species of
Bettas (which is most other species).