Jump to content


Photo

Fire Extinguisher Co2


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

#41 NoRp

NoRp

    Fish Crazy

  • Member
  • 255 posts
  • 0 reviews

Posted 11 September 2008 - 11:27 AM

i could be a total idiot but imo they realy cant be that bad. i know we are adding the regulator but these FE are in schools around the country and kids are often playing with them, hell in my school we used to spray them for fun. if they where indeed this deadly i highly doubt they could be placed around schools without supervision. as we all know kids like to experiment with stupid stuff and ive never heard of a kid being blownup by a FE

#42 chesterscot

chesterscot

    Leader of the Fishes

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 1,973 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:chester

Posted 11 September 2008 - 11:33 AM

interesting guide never thought about doing that
scot :good:

#43 aaronnorth

aaronnorth

    www.ukaps.org

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,822 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Worksop, Notts, UK

Posted 11 September 2008 - 02:59 PM

i could be a total idiot but imo they realy cant be that bad. i know we are adding the regulator but these FE are in schools around the country and kids are often playing with them, hell in my school we used to spray them for fun. if they where indeed this deadly i highly doubt they could be placed around schools without supervision. as we all know kids like to experiment with stupid stuff and ive never heard of a kid being blownup by a FE


They are safe - er with the horn on, once you take it off, then that is when it becomes dangerous.

#44 the Guru

the Guru

    New Member

  • Member
  • 42 posts
  • 0 reviews

Posted 11 September 2008 - 04:50 PM

i could be a total idiot but imo they realy cant be that bad. i know we are adding the regulator but these FE are in schools around the country and kids are often playing with them, hell in my school we used to spray them for fun. if they where indeed this deadly i highly doubt they could be placed around schools without supervision. as we all know kids like to experiment with stupid stuff and ive never heard of a kid being blownup by a FE


Try spraying one without the horn on *actually, DONT!*

#45 NoRp

NoRp

    Fish Crazy

  • Member
  • 255 posts
  • 0 reviews

Posted 11 September 2008 - 06:37 PM

but my point is surly the regulator fits just as snug as the horn would? so if the seal is safe enough for kids im sure its safe enough if we be carfull when using it.

#46 aaronnorth

aaronnorth

    www.ukaps.org

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,822 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Worksop, Notts, UK

Posted 11 September 2008 - 06:57 PM

They are fine with a reg on, they do the same job as a horn - bring the pressure down

I though you meant without one :crazy:

#47 garuf

garuf

    Fish Addict

  • Member
  • 884 posts
  • 0 reviews

Posted 11 September 2008 - 06:59 PM

Sweet lord it doesn't half hurt if you fire one without the horn, It's like holding a firework.
Using a fire extinguisher is totally safe as long as you're not totally negligent, this means treat them with respect and don't ever knock one over.

#48 zub-typer

zub-typer

    Fish Fanatic

  • Member
  • 92 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 26 September 2008 - 05:54 PM

I have found a reasonable priced regulator here;

http://www.theliving...-regulator.html

same spec as the one from that German Ebay company.

I'm going to order one from them soon.

#49 Krigo

Krigo

    New Member

  • Member
  • 20 posts
  • 0 reviews

Posted 13 October 2008 - 07:11 PM

Woah, good topic I hope I'm not really bumping this or anything but this really helps, and gives warnings too!

Is it possible to be pinned? :D

#50 nitro7

nitro7

    Fishaholic

  • Member
  • 435 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:newcastle

Posted 13 October 2008 - 08:26 PM

This was posted on the Barr Report the other day - One of the dangers of planted tanks!. Not the first time I've heard this either.

James

just read this thread james,what would happen if this leaked in your sitting room ? a room full of C02 :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick: :sick:

#51 aaronnorth

aaronnorth

    www.ukaps.org

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,822 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Worksop, Notts, UK

Posted 14 October 2008 - 03:01 PM

CO2 is a gas so just open a window to let some more oxygen in, dpending on size of room it wouldnt be as bad as that (the truck is only small)

#52 Behold

Behold

    Fishaholic

  • Member
  • 548 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Location:Basingstoke, Hants. UK

Posted 18 October 2008 - 11:08 PM

CO2 going off is dangerous but a nitrous bottle having a pipe failure near the olive ring while open is not only as dangerous as any presured canister but you endup with little white crystals flying everywhere. i managed to controll the bottle and turn it off only to put miy hand on one of the crystals. pin point frost bite. hurt for weeks....

Im thinking the FE is a good option as there made solid enought to be place in an office un teathered. as said be careful and it will be fine.

#53 Million

Million

    Fishaholic

  • Member
  • 677 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cardiff

Posted 29 October 2008 - 10:38 AM

I just got myself a classic eBay bargain, 2kg CO2 FE for 1p! (plus 12.50 postage). Full and serviced too. Can anyone tell me the least expensive reg that is compatible with a standard CO2 FE?

#54 aaronnorth

aaronnorth

    www.ukaps.org

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,822 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Worksop, Notts, UK

Posted 29 October 2008 - 11:47 AM

thats great, look in my sig for equipment needed, it gives a link to a reg that is £30, but with no solenoid.

#55 Million

Million

    Fishaholic

  • Member
  • 677 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cardiff

Posted 29 October 2008 - 02:42 PM

thats great, look in my sig for equipment needed, it gives a link to a reg that is £30, but with no solenoid.

The one from Weld UK? If it's definitely compatible that's great

#56 aaronnorth

aaronnorth

    www.ukaps.org

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,822 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Worksop, Notts, UK

Posted 30 October 2008 - 10:39 AM

yes, you also need this attachment so it brings the size down to the normal size of CO2 tubing:

http://www.welduk.co...p?ProductID=291

#57 Million

Million

    Fishaholic

  • Member
  • 677 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cardiff

Posted 30 October 2008 - 01:58 PM

yes, you also need this attachment so it brings the size down to the normal size of CO2 tubing:

http://www.welduk.co...p?ProductID=291


Thanks Aaron, that's really helpful of you :good:

Looking forward to pressurized CO2!

One more question: Is it ok to get a Y splitter so I can attach 2 diffusers to one CO2 line?

#58 aaronnorth

aaronnorth

    www.ukaps.org

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,822 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Worksop, Notts, UK

Posted 30 October 2008 - 02:04 PM

yes, or if you want to vary the output of CO2 to each one, then you can use one of these: http://cgi.ebay.co.u...1742.m153.l1262

they are usually used to run it ointo 2 tanks though so not much point in them.

#59 aaronnorth

aaronnorth

    www.ukaps.org

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,822 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Worksop, Notts, UK

Posted 01 June 2009 - 02:09 PM

a short video here that may be of some use.

http://www.aquatic-e...urized-co2.html

#60 Dan-CR4

Dan-CR4

    Fishaholic

  • Member
  • 685 posts
  • 0 reviews
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mitcham UK

Posted 26 April 2011 - 05:04 PM

Great post. I followed these instructions and was really worried by what would happen when I test the FE, took it outside to test and all I got was a nice little hissing sound. phew.

So now have my co2 FE system running. Thanks to the OP for the info and everyone else who has added to the thread, to make this an easy process. :good:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users