Small Mbuna |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Small Mbuna |
May 18 2008, 10:01 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Fishaholic Group: Members Posts: 438 Joined: 17-April 07 From: Swansea, South Wales Member No.: 31277 |
got a 40USG tank ready to set up, planning on going for mbuna.
I plan to have 6 L.caeruleus and 6 P.socolofi, and I want another 6, preferably either a single species or a few individuals of other species to go in, but im not sure which can anyone recommend any suitable mbuna which stay 5" or less? EDIT - preferably something which isn't blue or yellow This post has been edited by joecoral: May 18 2008, 10:06 PM |
|
|
|
May 18 2008, 10:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Support bacteria. They're the only culture some people have. Group: Members Posts: 3152 Joined: 12-September 05 From: Kansas Member No.: 15832 |
got a 40USG tank ready to set up, planning on going for mbuna. I plan to have 6 L.caeruleus and 6 P.socolofi, and I want another 6, preferably either a single species or a few individuals of other species to go in, but im not sure which can anyone recommend any suitable mbuna which stay 5" or less? Unless your 40 is a 4-foot, it's not going to work for mbuna. If it is a 4-ft, I'd go with a max of 10-12 adults, so you would be stocked with what you are already planning. |
|
|
|
May 19 2008, 02:01 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Fishaholic Group: Members Posts: 438 Joined: 17-April 07 From: Swansea, South Wales Member No.: 31277 |
dimensions are 101x41x50cm (3'3" x 1'3" x 1'6")
gross volume is actually 55USG according the the aquarium calculator, altho i assume it will be closer to 45 after displacement of water and rocks so because it's not 4' it completely rules out mbuna altogether?! JC This post has been edited by joecoral: May 19 2008, 02:01 PM |
|
|
|
May 19 2008, 07:47 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 3-January 08 From: Florida Member No.: 38080 |
Actually yes. Mbuna need 55 or larger.
Why don't you look at some Lake Taganyika shell dwellers like the multies... I personally want some of those in my new tank when I get it. |
|
|
|
May 19 2008, 08:39 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Why are the best looking fish hardest to keep? Group: Members Posts: 1936 Joined: 20-January 08 From: South Dakota, USA Member No.: 38583 |
Here is your tanks volume: Your tank's volume is 207,050 cubic centimeters or 207.05 liters, which is approximately 53.23 U.S. gallons, from this site.
It is possible to still have some neat african cichlids in there. Just not the kind you had in mind. Look here |
|
|
|
May 20 2008, 02:30 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Support bacteria. They're the only culture some people have. Group: Members Posts: 3152 Joined: 12-September 05 From: Kansas Member No.: 15832 |
dimensions are 101x41x50cm (3'3" x 1'3" x 1'6") gross volume is actually 55USG according the the aquarium calculator, altho i assume it will be closer to 45 after displacement of water and rocks so because it's not 4' it completely rules out mbuna altogether?! JC Unfortuantly mbuna aren't going to work, they really need the 4-ft length to set up territories. However, as adpierin and kj point out, your tank would be perfect for some of the smaller Lake Tanganikya fish, or some of the African riverine species. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
small mbuna | 9 | Hanako | 117 | 31st August 2005 - 01:07 PM Last post by: freddyk |
![]() |
Wanted - Mbuna's + Small Aquarium West London / Middlesex |
2 | BettaUK | 98 | 6th September 2007 - 06:06 AM Last post by: BettaUK |
![]() |
Why Is 120l Tank Too Small For Mbuna advice needed |
4 | signman | 240 | 26th February 2008 - 12:02 PM Last post by: Danio123 |
![]() |
Baby Mbuna...small Fry | 5 | welly | 66 | 22nd May 2008 - 09:47 PM Last post by: welly |
![]() |
Baby Mbuna...small Fry | 5 | welly | 113 | 27th May 2008 - 04:11 AM Last post by: sykogngsta |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th August 2008 - 07:34 PM |