Home

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Digest For The Successful Aquarium, rdd1952, fredgarvin, and all other 'older' folk, check it out.
Snooks1!
post Mar 1 2008, 04:52 PM
Post #1


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 772
Joined: 11-December 07
From: Mid-east Missouri
Member No.: 37528



I just bought an 80 gal tank from an old man unable to keep fish any more...Along with all the goodies that come with the tank ( some old, some new ), I found a copy of

'DIGEST FOR THE SUCCESSFUL AQUARIUM'
The Wonderful World Of Tropical fish

by Dr. Ulrich Baensch & Hans A. Baensch.

Circa 1975 laugh.gif

Maybe some of our older members remember reading this? Here are some scans...If anybody wants, I will scan the whole book - just let me know. It's a fun nostalgic look WAAAAY back into the past of fishkeeping.







1inch/gal rule...How long has this been around?


Again





Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dzsigmond217
post Mar 1 2008, 05:39 PM
Post #2


Fishaholic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 23-January 08
From: N.Y USA
Member No.: 38677



Thats neat that the guy still had this book. I love the illustration of the front cover..very family oriented w00t.gif
The info sounds pretty good on the page I could read I think. I'd keep the book..it could be worth something one day..lol!
Dianne
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredgarvin
post Mar 1 2008, 06:40 PM
Post #3


Fish Fanatic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 25-February 08
Member No.: 39732



Thanx for the thought, Snooks. and thanx for using "older" not "old". Actually, since my hair is still dark and still WITH me, and I don't need glasses and lack wrinkles, most folks think I'm in my late 30's or early 40's at worst. Really cool "retro" book.

This post has been edited by fredgarvin: Mar 1 2008, 06:42 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
littlest
post Mar 1 2008, 07:01 PM
Post #4


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 567
Joined: 19-August 07
From: UK
Member No.: 34710



I wasn't keeping fish in them days (wasn't born in them days to tell the truth) but love the book. The front cover is awesome, I love retro advertising.

I found a fishkeeping book in a charity shop a while book that wasn't that disimilar. I don't how old it was but it talked about aquariums having slate bottoms but modern ones are now available in all glass!
The pictures of the fish in that book were all painted rather than photographed too.

This post has been edited by littlest: Mar 1 2008, 07:12 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larissa
post Mar 1 2008, 07:12 PM
Post #5


Fishaholic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 333
Joined: 18-November 07
From: London
Member No.: 37001



I love the framed pictures of fish on the family's walls. Like anyone would actually do that. lol rolleyes.gif (sorry if anyone does) tongue2.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
littlest
post Mar 1 2008, 07:13 PM
Post #6


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 567
Joined: 19-August 07
From: UK
Member No.: 34710



QUOTE (Larissa @ Mar 1 2008, 07:12 PM) *
I love the framed pictures of fish on the family's walls. Like anyone would actually do that. lol rolleyes.gif (sorry if anyone does) tongue2.gif


I was going to say that I love the idea that people who keep fish would have pictures of fish on their living room walls, but then I thought someone might have pictures of their fish on their living room walls and might be offended.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ace Of Spades
post Mar 1 2008, 07:15 PM
Post #7


AOS
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1572
Joined: 5-February 08
From: Billericay, Essex, UK
Member No.: 39091



QUOTE (littlest @ Mar 1 2008, 07:13 PM) *
QUOTE (Larissa @ Mar 1 2008, 07:12 PM) *
I love the framed pictures of fish on the family's walls. Like anyone would actually do that. lol rolleyes.gif (sorry if anyone does) tongue2.gif


I was going to say that I love the idea that people who keep fish would have pictures of fish on their living room walls, but then I thought someone might have pictures of their fish on their living room walls and might be offended.


Hey when I go fishing, I take pictures and put them on my wall!!! tongue2.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larissa
post Mar 1 2008, 07:20 PM
Post #8


Fishaholic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 333
Joined: 18-November 07
From: London
Member No.: 37001



QUOTE (Ace Of Spades @ Mar 1 2008, 07:15 PM) *
QUOTE (littlest @ Mar 1 2008, 07:13 PM) *
QUOTE (Larissa @ Mar 1 2008, 07:12 PM) *
I love the framed pictures of fish on the family's walls. Like anyone would actually do that. lol rolleyes.gif (sorry if anyone does) tongue2.gif


I was going to say that I love the idea that people who keep fish would have pictures of fish on their living room walls, but then I thought someone might have pictures of their fish on their living room walls and might be offended.


Hey when I go fishing, I take pictures and put them on my wall!!! tongue2.gif


Hmm...not quite the same thing as having pretty fishy watercolours on your wall. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
skoppers
post Mar 1 2008, 07:24 PM
Post #9


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 11-February 08
Member No.: 39274



I love old aquarium books, especially the excited way they talk about 'new' technologies that are way out of date these days. What amazes me is how much of the advice is still valid though.

I recently bought a book from 1932 for a measly £5. Yes, 1932. It's American and most of the fish and plants are North American but even then plants like Vallis and fish like Badis Badis and bettas were supposedly fairly common. It also mentioned the 1" per gallon rule!

The biggest change was that almost no powered filters or airpumps were used and they recommended that a properly balanced aquarium would not need cleaning or water changes apart from a once-a-year stripdown. Tank ecology was more important and it struck me how we rely on technology these days, perhaps more than we need to.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrimper
post Mar 1 2008, 08:26 PM
Post #10


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 637
Joined: 25-October 07
From: Leicester, UK
Member No.: 36476



I like it!

My dad has got an old Computer Science Dictionary that i think is from the 70's. It talks about a 10MB hard drive being huge.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rdd1952
post Mar 1 2008, 11:39 PM
Post #11


www.callbobforhomes.com
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7150
Joined: 19-January 05
From: Mt. Holly, NC
Member No.: 11229



Nice book to come across. It just goes to show that 1" per gallon isn't all bad and also mentions that it's "sufficient for beginners". Still good advice today. Not too fond of the idea that it shows 3 goldfish in an unfiltered bowl though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jakeroberts
post Mar 2 2008, 09:14 AM
Post #12


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 664
Joined: 18-February 07
From: brisbane'Australia
Member No.: 29359



when i first started fishkeeping a year ago i bought this book of ebay for $10 it was written in 1982 by Dr. Herbert R. Axelrod it is very good book and is in excelent condition and also mentions the 1 inch rule
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
confusion
post Mar 2 2008, 02:38 PM
Post #13


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 567
Joined: 29-May 06
From: Atlanta, GA
Member No.: 21702



Completely agree, Skoppers. We have quite complex life support systems for keeping fish these days. Back in the day, I had an angelfish and a kissing gourami in a 29G tank and that was a lot!

Now, I have CF lights, compressed CO2 systems, massive canister filters, timers, uv filters, fertilizers and on and on. Back then I had a small filter that I cleaned once a month - sometimes less often.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rdd1952
post Mar 2 2008, 03:56 PM
Post #14


www.callbobforhomes.com
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7150
Joined: 19-January 05
From: Mt. Holly, NC
Member No.: 11229



Just a side question for those that were in the hobby back in the "dark ages" so to speak. Do you notice that fish live any longer today with the improved filtration we now have or any other differences for the good or bad that are/could be related to newer technology?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pat3612
post Mar 2 2008, 06:53 PM
Post #15


Fishaholic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 205
Joined: 23-January 08
Member No.: 38700



I dont know if fish live any longer but they seem to be much weaker then in the good old days. I used to breed livebearers and all we had were in tank carbon filters. Only did water changes once in a while, and hardly ever lost any fish. We didnt run around testing water every day and I still dont.
Pat
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rdd1952
post Mar 2 2008, 07:16 PM
Post #16


www.callbobforhomes.com
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7150
Joined: 19-January 05
From: Mt. Holly, NC
Member No.: 11229



From what I have read, it seems the "weaker" fish are partly/mostly a result of inbreeding. As for testiing, I never test any more but I did when I was getting my tanks up and running. I think the 2 go hand in hand though. Because of the weaker fish (what ever the reason may be), they aren't as tolerant of bad water conditions. That's not to say that people back then had bad water parameters on a regular basis but more that the fish were able to tolerate the ammonia and nitrite spikes in the beginning better than they can now. Even then though, as I mentioned in another thread, I'm sure a lot of people tried the hobby back then and were turned off because they kept losing fish and didn't have the resources we have today to figure out what was causing the deaths and how to fix the problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pat3612
post Mar 2 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #17


Fishaholic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 205
Joined: 23-January 08
Member No.: 38700



QUOTE (rdd1952 @ Mar 2 2008, 01:16 PM) *
From what I have read, it seems the "weaker" fish are partly/mostly a result of inbreeding. As for testiing, I never test any more but I did when I was getting my tanks up and running. I think the 2 go hand in hand though. Because of the weaker fish (what ever the reason may be), they aren't as tolerant of bad water conditions. That's not to say that people back then had bad water parameters on a regular basis but more that the fish were able to tolerate the ammonia and nitrite spikes in the beginning better than they can now. Even then though, as I mentioned in another thread, I'm sure a lot of people tried the hobby back then and were turned off because they kept losing fish and didn't have the resources we have today to figure out what was causing the deaths and how to fix the problem.

I agree with you there and I think the tests are a must for a newbie I still test about once a month, and I have to say I certainly think fish and plants are healthier with all the new filters etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abzorbd
post Mar 2 2008, 09:37 PM
Post #18


Fishaholic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 14-February 08
From: Kenosha Wisconsin
Member No.: 39384



That's pretty awesome. Nice find. good.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ICEEGRL
post Mar 3 2008, 06:16 PM
Post #19


Leader of the Fishes
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1748
Joined: 6-October 06
From: Louisiana
Member No.: 25525