BEST TANK SIZES FOR FW FISH, USA Common Sizes |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BEST TANK SIZES FOR FW FISH, USA Common Sizes |
May 26 2005, 03:21 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
crazy betta lady 0.o Group: Member Posts: 1281 Joined: 19-March 05 From: fort worth texas Member No.: 12550 |
i disagree with the 10 gallon not being a good begginer tank... my 2 first tanks were both 10 gallons (actually my very first was 1) but yea i have had them for quite some time and no problems!
|
|
|
|
May 26 2005, 09:05 AM
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Fish Addict Group: Member Posts: 885 Joined: 28-February 05 From: Houston, Tx. Member No.: 12142 |
My first tank was also a 10 gallon. Twice my fish died because I didn't know anything. I keep a betta in it now and it's pretty easy but that's with only 1 fish in it
|
|
|
|
May 26 2005, 03:19 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Fishaholic Group: Members Posts: 359 Joined: 29-April 05 From: Gdl, Mexico Member No.: 13301 |
I do think that starting off big is better than with less than a 10Gal tanks, specially because, at least in my case, when you get into the hobbie the first thing you want to do is to get as many "pretty" fish you see at the store.
Even though I'm 23, I was lucky that the guy at the LPS told me to get as much info as possible before getting the fish I wanted, because I was about to get 15 little fish (including a niddle fish and 2 angels I got 2 fish instead (but I've had gotten other 4 somewere else) and from those 6 only 2 made it through the terrible "New tank" syndrome. So, I'm about to get a 55/75Gal tank now |
|
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 10:34 AM
Post
#24
|
|||
![]() Leader of the Fishes Group: Members Posts: 1517 Joined: 21-April 04 From: PA Member No.: 5587 |
Actually around me where a 120 is a 4ft tank the 120 was more money and a 100 was also within $5 of a 125. As far as cost per gallon there is a drastic difference between a 125 and a 180 or 120(basically anything 24" wide. Also though a 125 6' tends to be just about as reasonable as a 90G within $40. |
||
|
|
|||
Jul 25 2005, 05:58 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Fish Crazy Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 23-July 05 From: Sheffield, UK Member No.: 14799 |
After keeping fish for 40-odd years and manufacturing 1000,s of aquaria, I would definitely advise going as large as you can, with a personal preferance of being slightly wider than tall, for optical effect and also ease of maintenance.
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2005, 03:56 PM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Fish Crazy Group: Member Posts: 198 Joined: 5-September 05 From: perth, scotland Member No.: 15710 |
I have a 10 gallon tropical tank but that was bought cause I didn't have a lot of money and wanted to start on tropicals and having 15 years of goldfish keeping and yes one of my first goldfish is still with us.
Basically I would sudgest 20 to 30 gallons to be a good starter tank i.e. the bigger the tank the easier to control the invisable stuff |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2005, 05:48 PM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Chuck Norris is the reason why waldo's hiding Group: Members Posts: 2163 Joined: 20-October 05 From: San Jose,California Member No.: 16520 |
I suggest you go with the other people... I have a 10 gallon because I'm planning to put in small fish in it like tetras and cories...But im still not sure they would fit...Well anyways the saying is not "the bigger the tank the more work" its actually "The smaller the tank the more work" one reason being that the water in a 5 gallon and 10 gallon can change pretty quickly. One mistake all the water in it goes bad. But if your an exprienced fish keeper than you would quickly know tricks to help all those problems for happening. Not saying that I have experience I get help from the experienced.
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2005, 03:55 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 18 Joined: 10-June 05 From: USA Member No.: 13957 |
old post This post has been edited by thecatdidit: May 17 2006, 04:26 PM |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2005, 02:07 PM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() No son of Dracula wears a woggle... Group: Members Posts: 7318 Joined: 23-December 04 From: Raxacoricofallapatorius! Since moved to Portsmouth, UK. Member No.: 10732 |
QUOTE QUOTE I don't suggest under a 20L for anyone new to the hobby 40 breeder or larger would be best (but not as cheep as the 20L 10g are inexpensive and great for sick tanks, but too small to be considered "easy" care. IF you HAVE to go smaller the 15g normal Long? is ok as well as the 10g Any other shapes are inferior I just don't know what to say... I sell aquatic supplies part time at an independent pet store. In the past month sales have been very good. I can tell you overall we have sold some 55 of Marineland's Eclipse System tanks. About 10 were 3 gallon bows, c. 10 were 5 gallon hex, c. 10 were 5 gallon corner, c. 15 were 6 gallon bows, and 10 were 12 gallon bows. I personally sold about 1/3 of them. I tried to explain what would be appropriate for these tanks. For the right customer, with guidance, they can be very enjoyable small tanks. Mhm... I see both sides, having started with a 3g, but unless like me and many others you need housing for lots of bettas, anything under 5g is just a waste... I find with the 3g's, 100% water changes are needed and it is just too heavy to move in one go full of water. Also, anything under 10g is very hard to stock- there are plenty of options, but many are uncommon and rarely imported, and most really aren't things people who's first tank it is would pick. Tank sizewise, go for the widest you can. I get very annoyed when I go out and all the tanks have 12" width- this is useless, really, unless you're only keeping very small community fish. More width definately makes aquascaping easier, I found it very hard to aquascape my 15g, which is 18"L x 12"Wx 15"H. This post has been edited by OohFeeshy: Dec 31 2005, 02:08 PM |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2006, 02:43 AM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Washington state, USA Member No.: 17753 |
QUOTE(silver @ Jun 2 2004, 08:23 PM) [snapback]308864[/snapback] Hmmmmm, that's strange because my 29 gallon is 18.5" tall x 30" long and my 20 gallon is 16" tall x 24" long! (just measured Is that because you have a 20g tall, and they are talking about a 20g long? |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2006, 03:04 AM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Fish Fanatic Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 3-January 06 From: banffshire scotland Member No.: 17956 |
QUOTE(wishiwasafish @ Nov 20 2004, 08:32 AM) [snapback]549343[/snapback] sand bottem tanks are the way to go for looks cause it is ever canging the bottem never looks same twice (a week or so) but it kinda sucks for cleaning ( i'm always suckuing up sand .....) any opne with a sand bottem tank have a secret on how to save the sand but suck the poo? lol that sounds funnny i started of with a 50 gallon tank and now want a bigger one i never had any problems with it. the size of tank also goes on what you want to put in it small shaoling fish or bigger the smaller the fish the more you can put in the bigger the less it all depends on what kind of fish that you want to keep in it. my tank is a mixed comunity tropical and has 35 different sized fish my 20 has 16 guppies that are swiming and breeding so it all depends on what you want to keep |
|
|
|
Feb 11 2006, 06:18 AM
Post
#32
|
|
![]() Fish Fanatic Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 12-January 06 From: Arizona Member No.: 18191 |
Well since we are all giving opinions here... (everyones got one) I would say if you got the money you should start off with nothing less then a 5 X 2 X 2....
I personally would never go less then 2 foot deep again... it adds a lot of options. I also would not go with anything other then 2 foot deep for an aquarium tank. AS far as how wide... 5 foot is a good starting point so you have lots of running room for your fish but the wider the better..... I have a 7 foot tank...but a 12 foot tank would really look nice in my house if I had a bigger fish tank room and not 4 kids... |
|
|
|
Apr 17 2006, 03:19 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Leader of the Fishes Group: Members Posts: 1463 Joined: 29-March 06 From: Luton, Britain Member No.: 20215 |
QUOTE(monty671 @ Aug 29 2004, 09:04 PM) [snapback]449037[/snapback] QUOTE(reiben @ May 30 2004, 08:00 AM) I think a 10 gallon is a good size for a beginner. In a way the bigger the tank the more work. I think you are completly wrong. Why put someone new throught the agany of having to deal with all the problems of a small tank. Tanks are backwards to what you would think. The new people NEED big tanks. Small tanks are for people who know what they are doing. IMHO Monty671 Actually, a smaller tank reuqires less maintenace then a huge tank. My 3 gallon is so easy to clean out, that i clean it out all the time! ive never had problems with it! Cant wait for my 11gallon tank though! Some people simply dont have space and imo, you shouldnt have a tank unless you know what your doing. |
|
|
|
Apr 26 2006, 07:40 PM
Post
#34
|
|
![]() Fishaholic Group: Members Posts: 404 Joined: 9-March 06 From: VIRGINIA, USA Member No.: 19680 |
I think a lot of it depends on where you live, if you rent your home, own it, or still live with parents. (Alot of members I've met on this forum are still the middle school/high school age) just think, if you go to college, what can you fit in a dorm room? If you move out and have to rent a tiny appartment? my fiancee bought a 55 gallon, and I'm dreading moving out of his parents house with him... besides the obviousness of moving a tank that large, theres also the 'where are we going to put it' in the new place. Chances are, it will end up in the living room or common room, as that will probably be the only place where the stand and the tank and the sump pump will all fit without blocking off too much personal space. It also depends on what fish you want to keep. I'm a Betta Gal myself, thus, my 30 gallon is a sorority tank, my 10 gallon is for my old guy right now, my 5.5 gallon is divided into two, and I have 2 one gallon critter tote things and a glass 'bowl' that I'm unsure of how much water it holds. (Only one of my fish is in the last three, the other one gallon and the bowl are currently used to letting water sit for days on end to de-chlorinize the water.) My fiancee has an Oscar, and is already talking about 75 gallon tanks. *Sighs* |
|
|
|
Jun 5 2006, 02:00 AM
Post
#35
|
|
![]() Fishaholic Group: Members Posts: 274 Joined: 11-October 04 From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin Member No.: 9781 |
QUOTE(Qays @ Apr 17 2006, 05:19 AM) [snapback]1153467[/snapback] QUOTE(monty671 @ Aug 29 2004, 09:04 PM) [snapback]449037[/snapback] QUOTE(reiben @ May 30 2004, 08:00 AM) I think a 10 gallon is a good size for a beginner. In a way the bigger the tank the more work. I think you are completly wrong. Why put someone new throught the agany of having to deal with all the problems of a small tank. Tanks are backwards to what you would think. The new people NEED big tanks. Small tanks are for people who know what they are doing. IMHO Monty671 Actually, a smaller tank reuqires less maintenace then a huge tank. My 3 gallon is so easy to clean out, that i clean it out all the time! ive never had problems with it! Cant wait for my 11gallon tank though! Some people simply dont have space and imo, you shouldnt have a tank unless you know what your doing. You claim you clean it out all the time. It sound like your tank is never cycled then. So your fish are probably stressed. You should never change all the water, rarely if ever clean the bottom (I mean don't take the sand/gravel out and clean that, it's where much of the good bacteria live). Bigger is better! The smallest I would ever recommend would be a 20 gallon long, not high, but that's even tough to keep cycled properly. This post has been edited by Bryan: Jun 5 2006, 02:02 AM |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2006, 04:54 PM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 24 Joined: 2-June 06 Member No.: 21792 |
QUOTE(reiben @ May 30 2004, 06:00 AM) [snapback]302865[/snapback] I think a 10 gallon is a good size for a beginner. In a way the bigger the tank the more work I know this is a really old post, but I completely disagree. A larger tank lets the aquarist react to problems a little slower. Remember "Dillution is the solution to pollution!". The Bigger the better, especially when you're dealing with water issues. |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2006, 09:12 PM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Fish Fanatic Group: Members Posts: 48 Joined: 22-July 06 Member No.: 23137 |
QUOTE(wishiwasafish @ Nov 20 2004, 04:32 AM) [snapback]549343[/snapback] sand bottem tanks are the way to go for looks cause it is ever canging the bottem never looks same twice (a week or so) but it kinda sucks for cleaning ( i'm always suckuing up sand .....) any opne with a sand bottem tank have a secret on how to save the sand but suck the poo? lol that sounds funnny I had the same problem, however, I began holding the tube suking up the water at the bottom of my index finger. With that same finger (pointing straight out) I gently stir the sand in a mini circle the dirt and poo swirl up into the tube and tend to leave the heaver sand behind. Just dont stir too deep or too fast. I hope it works for you as it did for me. |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2006, 10:34 AM
Post
#38
|
|
![]() Newbie Group: Member Posts: 6 Joined: 26-August 06 Member No.: 24172 |
hi new to this just looking for the right size tank to start off with.the one ive found is below will this be acceptable thanks and is that price alright for it Rekord 120 Aquarium Complete aquarium with built in filtration, heater and lighting 120 Litres £111.99 The Rekord range is simplicity in its own field, enabling fish keepers old and new to experience the best Juwel Aquarium facilities. Volume: approx: 120 litres Light System with 1 x 25 W tube JUWEL |