Home

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dyed Fish Sales Not Being Outlawed In Uk, Lets make some noise
zampa
post Apr 20 2006, 09:54 PM
Post #81


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 31-October 05
From: South London
Member No.: 16715



Arfie

Just sent e-mail to my MP, lets see if he replies.

zampa good.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
creamo098765
post Apr 21 2006, 04:07 PM
Post #82


Fish Fanatic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 51
Joined: 24-March 06
From: uk kent
Member No.: 20074



I wrote to my mp and got two replis hope they listen

EDITED 30th APRIL

I got a letter Friday from my mp saying that he is goin to pass my inforamtion on and get back to me

This post has been edited by creamo098765: Apr 30 2006, 12:13 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam Gayne
post May 5 2006, 08:54 PM
Post #83


Fish Crazy
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Worcs, UK
Member No.: 16400



Hey guys,

Just received a second letter from my local MP. Enclosed was a letter addressed to him from Ben Bradshaw of DEFRA.

I will type up the letter at a later time, but the general gist of the letter is that the Animal Welfare Bill that is being passed through parliament at the moment will place onto any owner or keeper a duty to ensure the animals welfare. It will also prohibit the mutilation of an animal other than for medical treatment, and dyeing a fish by injection or tattoo would constitute mutilation, however, feeding dyed food is not classed as mutilation.

Reading this, it seems that until now, it has not been illegal to dye fish in this country, contrary to what we thought at the start of this thread.

I shall type up the entire letter some point next week...watch this space!

Adam
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Elaine Hill
post May 13 2006, 07:56 PM
Post #84


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 21-October 05
From: North Yorkshire, England, UK
Member No.: 16534



A letter has been despatched to my MP -w will see what response it brings. There are also a number of divers out there who anjoy watching fish (I am one of them) who are probably not aware of this issue. So, a letter has been sent to one of the diving magazines about it and giving links to the on-line petition at:

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/fishtank/petition.html

Every little helps.......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phoenixfish
post May 18 2006, 02:52 PM
Post #85


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 667
Joined: 24-February 06
From: hartshill,S-O-T,England
Member No.: 19386



wohh no way came home like 5 mins ago and found a real posh looking letter from the house of commons addressed to me
opened it up and lo behold
QUOTE

HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON SW1A OAA
May 16th 2006
Dear Mr Jarvest,
I have received a reply from DEFRA, which I enclose.
This highlights an inherent problem with the EU it enables many good an important things to happen but it also creates rather pointless rigidities such as this. It would not undermine the benefits of Community membership if there was some discretion granted to member states on matters like this.
I am sorry.
PP MARK FISHER MP
With best wishes Yours sincerely


QUOTE
Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P3JR
Telephone 08459 335577 Email helpline@defra.gsi.gov.uk Website www.defra.gov.uk

Mark Fisher MP
House of Commons
London Our ref: 242976/FM
SW1AOAA 8 May 2006
From the Minister for Local Environment, Marine and Animal Welfare
Ben Bradshaw MP
Thank you for your letter of 13 March enclosing an e-mail from your constituent Mr Luke Jarvest, regarding dyed fish sales in the UK.
You may be aware that Defra published the Animal Welfare Bill last year which is now being considered by Parliament. The practice of dyeing fish will be dealt with under regulations under the Bill. Up-to-date information on this and other issues relating to animal health and welfare can be found in the Defra website for: www.defra.gov.uk.
The specific rules for the import of different species of animal are complex and varied. Most animal health import rules are set by the European Union and are common for all Member States. The rules are specific to each animal species and vary depending on the purpose of the import.
Unfortunately, the UK Government cannot unilaterally declare a trade ban on imports of dyed fish if the trade is allowed under EU law. To declare such a ban would contravene free trade rules and be illegal under EU law. If the UK attempted to enact such a ban, it would be liable to infraction proceedings by the EU Commission. The UK Government can only declare a ban if the matter concerns animal health and welfare or human health and welfare.
With best wishes,

BEN BRADSHAW
(NVESTOR IN PEOPLE

wow what a reply
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arfie
post May 19 2006, 09:52 AM
Post #86


Leader of the Fishes
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1016
Joined: 20-July 04
From: Home of the Crooked Spire (Derbyshire,UK)
Member No.: 8116



Yep, I've just had the same thing yes.gif

I think if enough people keep the pressure up, DEFRA may take it seriously and push it through as an amendment once the original bill is in force unsure.gif

It was also nice to see that Ben Bradshaw (or rather his poor secretary no doubt) is personalising the letters, not only to the MP but also referring to the constituant too.

Keep up the good work people good.gif

Arfie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phoenixfish
post May 19 2006, 04:38 PM
Post #87


Fish Addict
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 667
Joined: 24-February 06
From: hartshill,S-O-T,England
Member No.: 19386



QUOTE
It was also nice to see that Ben Bradshaw (or rather his poor secretary no doubt) is personalising the letters, not only to the MP but also referring to the constituant too.


XD was alittle shocked at the effort it was all posh like for a likkle old boy like me lol it was on yellow card/thick paper itts the same stuff we are at the moment boing for our C.vs at high school so its now with my fish stuff
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mephisto
post May 19 2006, 08:11 PM
Post #88


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 7-April 06
From: Bristol
Member No.: 20424



It took a few weeks but I had a response today. I will type it verbatim as I dont have a scanner.

Dear Mr Hartfield

Thank you for your recent email regarding dyeing fish.

I can confirm that the Department of the Environment Food and Rural Affairs has stated that the recently passed animal welfare act will make it illegal to dye fish using certain techniques in the UK. This includes tattooing. which would be considered a mutilation and therfore banned under section 5 of the act.

DEFRA has confirmed that there are currently no plans to ban the import of dyed fish, which will therefore continue to be in sale in the UK. The department may reconsider this position during the public consultation on future regulations covering the pet trade. I do believe it wrong that we should allow such imports to continue, and I will do what I can to ensure that the issue is brought to the Departments attention during the consultation.

DEFRA has no current plans to ban other techniques not involving the physical interference with body tissues, such as feeding of certain foods. I understand, however, that the publication Practical Fishkeeping has been campaigning to restrict the sale of artificially dyed fish for a number of years. Their postion is that although they concede that there is no scientific evidence to suggest that such dyes are a welfare issue, they would "rather see naturally coloured species on sale". I would certainly concour with this view.

I hope this provides some reassurance to you, and recent measures are just the first step in tackiling this issue. Please do not hesistate to cantact me if there are any further issues you would like to bring to my attention.

Yours Sincerely

Kerry McCarthy MP


So although it may not be all that we want it is certainly getting closer to a ban we just have to keep the pressure on
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
creamo098765
post May 20 2006, 07:32 PM
Post #89


Fish Fanatic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 51
Joined: 24-March 06
From: uk kent
Member No.: 20074



QUOTE(mephisto @ May 19 2006, 09:11 PM) [snapback]1191206[/snapback]

It took a few weeks but I had a response today. I will type it verbatim as I dont have a scanner.

Dear Mr Hartfield

Thank you for your recent email regarding dyeing fish.

I can confirm that the Department of the Environment Food and Rural Affairs has stated that the recently passed animal welfare act will make it illegal to dye fish using certain techniques in the UK. This includes tattooing. which would be considered a mutilation and therfore banned under section 5 of the act.

DEFRA has confirmed that there are currently no plans to ban the import of dyed fish, which will therefore continue to be in sale in the UK. The department may reconsider this position during the public consultation on future regulations covering the pet trade. I do believe it wrong that we should allow such imports to continue, and I will do what I can to ensure that the issue is brought to the Departments attention during the consultation.

DEFRA has no current plans to ban other techniques not involving the physical interference with body tissues, such as feeding of certain foods. I understand, however, that the publication Practical Fishkeeping has been campaigning to restrict the sale of artificially dyed fish for a number of years. Their postion is that although they concede that there is no scientific evidence to suggest that such dyes are a welfare issue, they would "rather see naturally coloured species on sale". I would certainly concour with this view.

I hope this provides some reassurance to you, and recent measures are just the first step in tackiling this issue. Please do not hesistate to cantact me if there are any further issues you would like to bring to my attention.

Yours Sincerely

Kerry McCarthy MP


So although it may not be all that we want it is certainly getting closer to a ban we just have to keep the pressure on

I have had the same letter twice so i think maybe we are being phobed Off oh well we tried
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
daveyrobinsonuk
post Jun 5 2006, 02:23 PM
Post #90


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 5-June 06
From: cardiff
Member No.: 21858



[size=6]
OMG thats horrid. I'm setting up my first tank ( 1st proper tank anyway ) and I'm going to be getting tropical fish for a few years before I go onto Marine fish. Obviously Marine fish are usually a lot more colorful and usually pretty and so I was trying to find somewhere in these forums to ask the question > "What are the best looking/prettiest/most colorful Tropical fish??"

That dying process is disgusting and shows how damn selfish us humans can be. Is there anywhere on the internet that you know of that shows how fish NATURALLY look so that we can all stay clear of buying these poor fish? As I'm looking for fish based largely on looks, I think its probable that people like myself are more likely to unknowingly purchase these poor chaps.

Wouldn't it be good if we could watch animal abusers getting EATEN! w00t.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mpd
post Jun 6 2006, 09:48 AM
Post #91


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 27-September 05
Member No.: 16127



well done
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stone Warior
post Jun 7 2006, 05:24 PM
Post #92


Fish Fanatic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 27-May 06
Member No.: 21625



cant help i live in US =(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the man from atl...
post Jun 8 2006, 11:43 AM
Post #93


Fish Crazy
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 110
Joined: 6-November 05
From: Wrexham,N.Wales
Member No.: 16827



QUOTE(Phoenixfish @ May 18 2006, 03:52 PM) [snapback]1189530[/snapback]

QUOTE

HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON SW1A OAA
May 16th 2006
Dear Mr Jarvest,
I have received a reply from DEFRA, which I enclose.
This highlights an inherent problem with the EU it enables many good an important things to happen but it also creates rather pointless rigidities such as this. It would not undermine the benefits of Community membership if there was some discretion granted to member states on matters like this.
I am sorry.
PP MARK FISHER MP
With best wishes Yours sincerely


QUOTE
Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P3JR
Telephone 08459 335577 Email helpline@defra.gsi.gov.uk Website www.defra.gov.uk

Mark Fisher MP
House of Commons
London Our ref: 242976/FM
SW1AOAA 8 May 2006
From the Minister for Local Environment, Marine and Animal Welfare
Ben Bradshaw MP
Thank you for your letter of 13 March enclosing an e-mail from your constituent Mr Luke Jarvest, regarding dyed fish sales in the UK.................................................Unfortunately, the UK Government cannot unilaterally declare a trade ban on imports of dyed fish if the trade is allowed under EU law. To declare such a ban would contravene free trade rules and be illegal under EU law. If the UK attempted to enact such a ban, it would be liable to infraction proceedings by the EU Commission. The UK Government can only declare a ban if the matter concerns animal health and welfare or human health and welfare.
With best wishes,

BEN BRADSHAW
(NVESTOR IN PEOPLE

wow what a reply


Ok people, its time to get serious, if someone could draught a good letter, ( I am hopeless at writing official sounding letters) lets start sending them to our MEP's to bring up in Brussels, this issue is CLEARLY out of our own governments hands, and by the looks of thinks this is a Europe wide issue.

"contravineing free trade" I ask you!!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arfie
post Jun 9 2006, 12:28 AM
Post #94


Leader of the Fishes
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1016
Joined: 20-July 04
From: Home of the Crooked Spire (Derbyshire,UK)
Member No.: 8116



Thats an odd reply, the fact that it is a practice banned within the UK due to it being cruel, automatically makes it a matter of animal welfare blink.gif

I think Ben Bradshaw must be getting a bit pissed off with us now laugh.gif

Keep it up biggrin.gif

Arfie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Themuleous
post Jun 10 2006, 11:10 PM
Post #95


The one they call the mule
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 6103
Joined: 13-January 06
From: Oxford, England
Member No.: 18201



QUOTE(Phoenixfish @ May 18 2006, 03:52 PM) [snapback]1189530[/snapback]

The UK Government can only declare a ban if the matter concerns animal health and welfare or human health and welfare.


I'm sorry but what the hell it is if its not a matter of animal welfare!

Can we not just adapt the original letter to send to Brussels? Also might be worth letting PFK know about this and the Brussels idea?

Sam
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lordi
post Jun 13 2006, 02:13 PM
Post #96


Fish Fanatic
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 12-June 06
From: wisbech cambs\norfolk border
Member No.: 22065



hi all. i send me mp an email and this is the reply i got


Dear Alastair
I totally share your abhorrence at this practice and I will feed your
comments through to our team who are dealing with this legislation.
Thank you for writing to me on this important matter.
Malcolm Moss


so lets hope its an honest reply and some thing will get done
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
smurfy
post Jun 20 2006, 10:58 AM
Post #97


it's a shame stupidity isn't painfull
Group Icon

Group: Newsletter Team
Posts: 1268
Joined: 9-January 06
From: south shields
Member No.: 18103



i got a reply a while ago but never heard anything since hes at a local recreation centre alot so i might go jump on him there im going to send the letter again too
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
discus dreamer
post Jul 22 2006, 11:04 AM
Post #98


Fish Crazy
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 4-July 06
From: North West UK
Member No.: 22644



Thanks for the draft letter for our MPs about fish dyeing
that makes it easy to write, but noting the date of the first posting of this is it still current? Has there been any movement on this issue recently? I will sen